When we search the web for “Jagdeep Singh salary,” one name stands out as jaw-dropping: Jagdeep Singh — founder (and until recently CEO) of QuantumScape, the electric-vehicle battery company. In early 2025, major media reports claimed he became the “highest-paid employee in the world,” with a mind-boggling pay package.
In this friendly, straight-talk guide, imagine us chatting over a cup of chai, we’ll unpack what “Jagdeep Singh salary” really means: how much money he makes in a year, what might be his “in-hand” take after taxes, where it comes from, and whether such numbers are realistic or symbolic.
Who is Jagdeep Singh? A quick background
Jagdeep Singh is the Indian-origin entrepreneur behind QuantumScape, a firm working on next-gen “solid-state” EV batteries. He earned a B.Tech from Stanford University and an MBA from the University of California, Berkeley.
Before founding QuantumScape in 2010, he worked at big tech companies, gathering over a decade of experience, which helped him build the vision and leadership that drove his startup’s success.
Under him, QuantumScape drew investments from global heavyweights and positioned itself at the cutting edge of EV battery innovation.
In February 2024, he stepped down as CEO, but remains Chairman.
What “Jagdeep Singh salary per year” reports claim
According to multiple high-profile media reports in early 2025:
- His total compensation package was said to be ₹17,500 crore per year.
- That breaks down to roughly ₹48 crore per day, when averaged over 365 days.
- The package reportedly included stock options valued at approximately US$2.3 billion.
In other words: yes, by those headlines, Jagdeep Singh’s “salary per year” seems astronomically high, even compared with many national budgets of small countries.
Converting to the Indian context: What does that mean in LPA (Lakh per Annum)
In India, we often express annual income in “Lakh per Annum” (LPA), where 1 lakh = ₹100,000 (₹ 1,00,000).
If someone earns ₹17,500 crore per year, that is:
₹ 17,500 crore = ₹ 17,500 × 1 crore = ₹ 17,500 × (100 lakh) = ₹ 17,500 × 100 lakh = ₹ 1,750,000 lakh
So in LPA terms, that is ≈ ₹ 1,75,00,000 LPA.
Put even simpler: that’s one hundred seventy-five lakh thousand per annum, a number so large it loses its usual meaning in typical Indian salary contexts.
So “Jagdeep Singh salary per year in LPA” = ~ ₹ 1.75 million LPA (or 175 lakh thousand LPA), which is purely theoretical because such mega pay is nowhere near usual salaried incomes in India.
But here’s the catch: this enormous number is driven by stock-option awards and performance bonuses tied to long-term corporate targets, not a fixed “in-hand monthly salary.”
Why such a high number, and how real is it?
CTC vs gross vs net in hand
In normal salary parlance:
- CTC (Cost to Company): The total value the employer says the employee is worth, includes base salary, bonuses, stock options, perquisites, and benefits.
- Gross income: What you get before deductions (tax, retirement contributions, etc.).
- Net (in-hand / take-home pay): After taxes, contributions, and deductions.
For most employees, CTC and gross may be close, but for top executives like Singh, CTC is heavily skewed by stock-option valuations and long-term incentive plans, meaning the “realised in-hand” money depends on vesting, stock price, and conditions.
In 2021, for example, filings show that whilst his total compensation reached US$69 million, the bulk (≈ US$68 million) was “option awards.” Regular salary + bonus + other comp was only a small portion.
That means if market conditions, vesting schedules or performance targets are not met, the actual “in-hand” amount could be much lower than the headline ₹17,500 crore.
So “salary per day ₹48 crore” is more symbolic, representing potential value, than guaranteed cash-in-hand.
What might be Jagdeep’s “in-hand”, a rough, realistic scenario
Let’s create a realistic illustration, say a successful CEO earning ₹20 crore in a year (just for ease of comparison).
Particulars Annual Amount (₹)
CTC / total package 20,00,00,000 (₹ 20 crore)
Gross income (salary + bonuses) ~15,00,00,000 (assuming rest is stock options)
Approx. tax + deductions (say 35-40%)~5,50,00,000
Net in-hand take home pay ~ ₹ 9,50,00,000 (≈ ₹ 9.5 crore)
So if a “celebrity / CEO” earns ₹20 crore per annum, after taxes and deductions, the “in-hand income of celebrity” might come down to ₹8–10 crore.
In Singh’s case, given stock options and performance-tied compensation, the “in-hand income” is uncertain, depends on when (or if) those options vest and he sells shares, and what taxes apply globally and locally (if he resides outside India).
Hence, even though headlines talk of ₹17,500 crore, the actual “take-home pay” (liquid cash) could be far lower and spread over many years.
Why such mega-compensation? What are the “income sources” for a top executive
For a high-profile figure like Jagdeep Singh, income does not come from just one source. Some possible components:
- Base salary + annual bonus (regular cash pay)
- Stock options/grants (equity-based rewards)
- Performance-linked incentives (if the company meets growth or revenue milestones)
- Long-term incentive plans tied to stock price/company valuation
- Possibly other perks (health benefits, retirement contributions, allowances)
In general, high-earning professionals, especially in the tech or startup world, rely heavily on equity + stock options, because that links their reward to the long-term success of the company, not just short-term profit.
So a “celebrity salary breakdown” for someone like Singh would show the majority value in stock options/equity awards, not fixed cash salary. This is why “Jagdeep Singh’s salary breakdown” is more complicated than a fixed monthly paycheck.
Why “₹48 crore per day” sounds more like a headline than real cash
When the media says “₹48 crore per day,” it simply divides the total package by 365, but that doesn’t mean he gets ₹48 crore in his bank account every day.
Because:
- Most of the value is in stock options, not cash.
- Stock options vest over years and depend on performance and stock-price targets.
- Even after vesting, converting equity to cash requires selling shares, which may attract tax, market risk, and timing issues.
- He stepped down as CEO in Feb 2024; equity-based compensation may be long-term and not immediately liquid.
Thus, the “daily ₹48 crore” is more a symbolic way to convey magnitude, not actual take-home pay per day.
What this teaches about income, tax & wealth for high-earning people
From this case of Jagdeep Singh, we learn a few important lessons:
- CTC vs in-hand: High CTC often includes non-cash components (stocks, equity), not everything is immediate cash.
- Income sources matter: Many high-income people rely heavily on stock options, equity, and bonuses, not just a fixed salary.
- Vesting & performance risk: Equity rewards often depend on company performance or stock price; if targets are missed, value reduces.
- Tax & deductions: For high incomes (especially global incomes or equity-based pay), taxes, advance tax, foreign tax, sale of shares, etc., matter; take-home pay can drop drastically.
- Wealth growth through investments: Many high-net-worth people keep wealth in equity, investments, and assets, not just salary.
Why the net worth of celebrities / high-paid execs is often misleading
Headlines like “₹17,500 crore annual income” make us imagine unimaginable wealth, but:
- Not all is cash
- Equity may be locked or vest over years.
- Stock market risk can swing the value up or down.
- Taxes, sale restrictions, and holding periods reduce liquidity.
So when we read about huge “celebrity earnings per year,” it’s good to take it with a pinch of salt, always differentiate between potential value and actual realized wealth.
What we can learn, tips for smart money management
Even if you are not a billionaire exec, some principles hold for everyone:
- Diversify: Don’t rely just on salary, invest in assets, equities, mutual funds, and property.
- Understand long-term incentives: Equity plans can help, but treat them as long-term investments, not paycheck substitutes.
- Tax planning matters: For high-income, PF, TDS, and advance tax, investment-linked exemptions become crucial.
- Liquidity vs. wealth: Having wealth on paper ≠ liquid cash. Be careful before making big expenditures.
- Long-term vision: As Singh’s journey shows, value often lies in building something over the years, not just monthly pay.
Why “Jagdeep Singh salary in Indian rupees / dollars” becomes confusing
Because of stock options and the fact that QuantumScape is a U.S.-listed company, valuations and compensation are often quoted in USD, e.g., in 2021, his total compensation was reported as US$69 million.
When those are converted to Indian rupees, fluctuations in currency exchange rate, vesting schedule, and taxation make it difficult to state a stable “salary in rupees.”
Hence, when you search “jagdeep singh salary in dollars” or “in rupees,” you may find widely varying numbers depending on context (stock value, time, currency rate).
A friendly reality check
Imagine a regular professional in India earning ₹10–20 lakh per annum. Having a salary in crores may seem like a dream, and for most people, it remains that: a dream.
But for top-tier founders and tech-executives like Jagdeep Singh, income is rarely just salary. It’s complex, long-term, and tied to company performance and the stock market. So while “₹17,500 crore per year” has headline appeal, it doesn’t translate to ₹48 crore cash in hand daily.
Because of this, such massive packages remain mostly on paper until vested, sold, taxed, and even then sale price may vary.
Conclusion
Jagdeep Singh’s pay package, as widely reported, is nothing short of staggering. A headline of ₹17,500 crore per year and ₹48 crore per day grabs attention. But when you peel back layers, most of that value comes from stock options and long-term incentives, not fixed monthly pay. Real “in-hand income” depends on many factors — vesting, market performance, taxation, and time.
This story teaches an important lesson: for anyone aspiring to grow wealth, it’s not just about a high salary, it’s about smart financial planning, investments, tax planning and long-term vision.
Whether you are a student, salaried professional, or entrepreneur, understanding the difference between “CTC vs in-hand income” and how income sources influence real wealth is extremely valuable.
If you like, I can also prepare a table comparing 6–8 famous high-earning personalities (CEOs, celebrities, athletes), showing their “reported income vs likely in-hand taktake-homey.” That helps put such big numbers in perspective.
Disclaimer: All salary figures are estimates based on publicly available information. Actual numbers may vary. This article is for informational purposes only.
FAQs
Q1: Is ₹17,500 crore per annum real cash in hand for Jagdeep Singh?
No. That number includes stock options and performance-linked equity, not guaranteed cash. The actual cash he receives could be far lower depending on vesting, market conditions, and taxes.
Q2: Why do media still report daily income like ₹48 crore per day?
Because they divide the total package by 365 to show magnitude, but it’s symbolic, not a reflection of real daily take-home pay.
Q3: What is “CTC vs in-hand income”?
CTC includes base salary, bonuses, stock options, and perks. In-hand (net) is what the person actually receives after taxes, deductions, and after converting any equity to cash.
Q4: Why do many high-paid executives get richest through stock, not salary?
Equity aligns its reward with company success, encourages long-term growth rather than short-term profit, and can offer huge value if the company performs well.
Q5: As a regular salary earner, what can I learn from this story?
Focus on smart investments, diversify income sources, plan for taxes, treat any extra income or bonuses as long-term opportunities, not just spendable cash.
Read more
2.4 LPA In Hand Salary: Monthly, Yearly and After Tax Calculation
